Subscribe to RSS





Recent Comments


Chemistry News

- 09/01/10 PHD comic: 'You autumn leave'
Piled Higher and Deeper RSS Gradfeed
- Fragrance Overload?
C&ENtral Science
- 2010 nobel predictions
Everyday Scientist
- EuCheMS - Colloids and culture
The Sceptical Chymist
- Nanopore-Based Screening
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Crew Reported Safe In Gulf Oil Platform Fire
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Stimulating quasi-erotic excitement through organic structure determination
The Curious Wavefunction
- Industrial Gas Companies Face Brazilian Fine Muito Grande
C&ENtral Science
- An Early Harvest of Biofuels News
C&ENtral Science
- Bacterial Altruism
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Orexigen Partners With Takeda for Potential Obesity Drug Contrave
C&ENtral Science
- Plagiarism: Is the Digital Age becoming its number one accomplice?
ASSETT
- Posters and Pickiness
In the Pipeline
- Cork rings: a collection of links
Chemjobber
- Chemjobber C&EN Index: August 23, 2010 issue
Chemjobber

Distractions

by movies on May 23 2007 (754 Views)

While sitting on the couch watching TV last night, I got to thinking about what I consider one of the most important parts of grad school: what you do when you are not in lab. The rest of the working world takes this time for granted. No matter how many times I tell my parents the hours I work, everytime I call them at 7 pm, they are shocked when I say that I still have to go back to lab to do some more work. Would anyone be shocked by the hours I work if I were an I-banker? Probably not. So why is this so confounding to people?

Both of my parents went to grad school in humanities fields, and they admit that they worked really hard, and harder than they work in the jobs that they went to grad school to obtain. This seems to be a common occurrence: you have to work your ass off to get a job where you don’t have to work your ass off. The exception, of course, is if you go into the academics side of things and have to get tenure before you start sitting on your thumbs all day. As one of my former colleagues said, “once you get tenure, you can stop wearing pants.” Beautiful.

To the point, chemistry differs from humanities because you have to actually be in lab doing something for anything to get done. If you were, say, a historian, then everything has already been done, you just need to compile and make sense of it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that is an easy task, but at least you can work on that at home in sweat pants. A task like chemistry really invades your life. You have to be present for every part of the process, from set-up to work-up to data collection. Automated instruments help some, but they really just make the process of collecting the data more efficient.

So what is the difference here? Does this mean that a chemist does comparatively more work than a historian to get a PhD? Maybe, but then again a chemistry student probably gets paid more and will finish in 5-6 years instead of 7-10. Sounds like a wash to me.

The big question is how does the quality of life in those years compare? Please add some comments about how you spend your “free time” and how this helps you cope with all the time you commit to the lab. Some bloggers have made mention of their distractions on their blogs already including fish and beer.

And no, reading blogs about chemistry doesn’t count!

movies


Posted on : May 23 2007
Posted under Uncategorized |

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post




Google Ads





Recent Chemistry

In Situ Catalytic Encapsulation of Core-Shell Nanoparticles Having Variable Shell Thickness: Dielectric and Energy Storage Properties of High-Permittivity Metal Oxide Nanocomposites
(Chemistry of Materials)
ChemFeeds Nav: [Leave a Comment][See Related]

Good Chemistry Books


Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: Strategies for Drug Discovery and Development

Drug Design: Cutting Edge Approaches


Social Chemistry

- Probably the best chemistry channel on YouTube. [1 hour ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- An Urgent Question [8 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Materials Chemistry
- I can't wrap my head around s and p orbitals! [11 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Free radical reaction of carbon or silicon to aluminum [12 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- Primo Levi - Periodic Table of Videos [17 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Allylic alcohol, configuration inversion. [17 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Organic (Undergraduate)
- Could a good chemist weigh in on a question I'd like to be more informed about; Is sous-vide cooking safe? [18 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- What is the most dangerous substance according the NFPA 704 System? [19 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Solubility Software - Salting Out [20 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- File Format Conversion from GCMS raw data to .CDF format [22 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- transport number [1 day ago]
Chemical Forums - Physical (Graduate)
- Dear Chemit, I have a college Chemistry 102 proficiency exam tomorrow. What should I know? [1 day ago]
Chemistry Reddit