<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autocorrelation Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/</link>
	<description>We have technical difficulties, it will take a day or two to get back to normal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:51:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erdinc</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Erdinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-803</guid>
		<description>I make new web side for students. I hope you like and use it. Thanks.
www.periodic-elements.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make new web side for students. I hope you like and use it. Thanks.<br />
<a href="http://www.periodic-elements.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.periodic-elements.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enahs</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Enahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Sometime I can not stop. I actually enjoy statistics and have learned as much as possible.

If you (you = anybody) wants to do themselves a big favor and has an afternoon to kill, read these two books (they are small, and easy to read):
http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Guide-Statistics-Larry-Gonick/dp/0062731025/
and
http://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728/
You will be a better scientists if you do.

And actually, the Cartoon Guide to Chemistry (and the one to Physics) are really good too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime I can not stop. I actually enjoy statistics and have learned as much as possible.</p>
<p>If you (you = anybody) wants to do themselves a big favor and has an afternoon to kill, read these two books (they are small, and easy to read):<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Guide-Statistics-Larry-Gonick/dp/0062731025/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Guide-Statistics-Larry-Gonick/dp/0062731025/</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728/</a><br />
You will be a better scientists if you do.</p>
<p>And actually, the Cartoon Guide to Chemistry (and the one to Physics) are really good too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 23:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-794</guid>
		<description>The analysis I was working on here is for an introductory physical chemistry lab course. Unfortunately, the only readily available analytical tool on this level is Microsoft Excel. To allow everyone equal access, the whole manual is written in Excel. :(

I&#039;ve been told repeatedly that it&#039;s a bad program go use. Thanks for the recommendations. I&#039;ll definitely look into those, since I have another semester of analytical lab to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The analysis I was working on here is for an introductory physical chemistry lab course. Unfortunately, the only readily available analytical tool on this level is Microsoft Excel. To allow everyone equal access, the whole manual is written in Excel. <img src='http://www.chemistry-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been told repeatedly that it&#8217;s a bad program go use. Thanks for the recommendations. I&#8217;ll definitely look into those, since I have another semester of analytical lab to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enahs</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Enahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-793</guid>
		<description>As a follow up, and to test some anti-spaming mojo.

I usually use GraphPad Prism (http://www.graphpad.com/prism/) for my data analysis. It is quite powerful but easy to use. But not everybody can or is willing to buy it; but I do so much data compiling and combing of data it is worth it to me. Quite often I spend ~8 hours straight compiling and analyzing data from a group of people.

Believe it or not, a really good free program was one create in 1993 for Window 3.1. NCSS Jr (http://www.ncss.com/download_ncss_junior.html) it&#039;s graphs and plots and such are not as pretty and modern looking, but they get the job done.


There is also a nice website with a really good complete statistics and analysis package. StatCrunch (http://www.statcrunch.com/) now, it is like $5 for 6 months and $8 for 12. It is geared more towards Students. 

And of-course when you want to jump up to the big boy (which post people never need) is R. http://www.r-project.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up, and to test some anti-spaming mojo.</p>
<p>I usually use GraphPad Prism (<a href="http://www.graphpad.com/prism/" rel="nofollow">http://www.graphpad.com/prism/</a>) for my data analysis. It is quite powerful but easy to use. But not everybody can or is willing to buy it; but I do so much data compiling and combing of data it is worth it to me. Quite often I spend ~8 hours straight compiling and analyzing data from a group of people.</p>
<p>Believe it or not, a really good free program was one create in 1993 for Window 3.1. NCSS Jr (<a href="http://www.ncss.com/download_ncss_junior.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncss.com/download_ncss_junior.html</a>) it&#8217;s graphs and plots and such are not as pretty and modern looking, but they get the job done.</p>
<p>There is also a nice website with a really good complete statistics and analysis package. StatCrunch (<a href="http://www.statcrunch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.statcrunch.com/</a>) now, it is like $5 for 6 months and $8 for 12. It is geared more towards Students. </p>
<p>And of-course when you want to jump up to the big boy (which post people never need) is R. <a href="http://www.r-project.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.r-project.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enahs</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Enahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-789</guid>
		<description>The real lesson here is to never ever try and use Excel for a statistical analysis program! It is not.
It is a spread-sheet program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real lesson here is to never ever try and use Excel for a statistical analysis program! It is not.<br />
It is a spread-sheet program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yggdrasil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Yggdrasil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-788</guid>
		<description>This post inspired me to look back at an old o-chem lab of mine for my own example of fail.

&quot;Evaporation of the solvent by heating gave crude 10 ... as a brown oil at a 70.34% yield.  Flash chromatography ... yielded 10 as a yellow oil in 2.85% yield...&quot;

The TA&#039;s comment makes it even better (worse?): &quot;You lost 68%?!&quot;

Fortunately, I did not fail that assignment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post inspired me to look back at an old o-chem lab of mine for my own example of fail.</p>
<p>&#8220;Evaporation of the solvent by heating gave crude 10 &#8230; as a brown oil at a 70.34% yield.  Flash chromatography &#8230; yielded 10 as a yellow oil in 2.85% yield&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The TA&#8217;s comment makes it even better (worse?): &#8220;You lost 68%?!&#8221;</p>
<p>Fortunately, I did not fail that assignment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/04/30/autocorrelation-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=233#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Are you sure you can&#039;t see a peak? I think you could tease element 126 out of there. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure you can&#8217;t see a peak? I think you could tease element 126 out of there. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
