Subscribe to RSS





Recent Comments


Chemistry News

- 09/01/10 PHD comic: 'You autumn leave'
Piled Higher and Deeper RSS Gradfeed
- Fragrance Overload?
C&ENtral Science
- 2010 nobel predictions
Everyday Scientist
- EuCheMS - Colloids and culture
The Sceptical Chymist
- Nanopore-Based Screening
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Crew Reported Safe In Gulf Oil Platform Fire
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Stimulating quasi-erotic excitement through organic structure determination
The Curious Wavefunction
- Industrial Gas Companies Face Brazilian Fine Muito Grande
C&ENtral Science
- An Early Harvest of Biofuels News
C&ENtral Science
- Bacterial Altruism
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Orexigen Partners With Takeda for Potential Obesity Drug Contrave
C&ENtral Science
- Plagiarism: Is the Digital Age becoming its number one accomplice?
ASSETT
- Posters and Pickiness
In the Pipeline
- Cork rings: a collection of links
Chemjobber
- Chemjobber C&EN Index: August 23, 2010 issue
Chemjobber

Carbon NMR Fail

by Phil on May 16 2008 (2895 Views)

You need to measure a 13C-NMR for all new compounds, that’s a golden rule. But what do you do when you can’t dissolve more than, say, 5 mg, of your stuff? Either you can’t afford to dump more of it in DMSO, never to be seen again*, or it just isn’t soluble enough.

In that case you simply try anyway, run an overnight experiment on a 400 MHz machine, and hope for the best. Sometimes it will work, sometimes it won’t.

Ugly 13C spec

What you always get is the massive solvent signal. On the left, there are some tiny bumps in the background noise, mocking me, that might just be the beginnings of real peaks. Of course there should be many more peaks than the three you can hardly see.

What now? I can hand this over to the NMR service. The first thing they will ask is: “Why don’t you give us a more concentrated sample?” In the past, I even had to redo a synthesis in order to get enough material for a missing carbon spec. Naturally, I should have started the synthesis on a larger scale, but somehow I always end up with those ominous 10 mg of end product. I hate sacrificing so much precious product to the DMSO god!

* I know it is possible to evaporate DMSO, but it takes forever. Also, the material I get out of it is usually an ugly, sticky oil instead of the nice solid I started with.


Posted on : May 16 2008
Tags:
Posted under Uncategorized |

RSS feed | Trackback URI

11 Comments »

Comment by Paula Schramm (2008-05-16 04:48:40)


There are methods to supress Solvent signals. Not that I would know what they are, but my boss does. I have the same problem with one of my compunds. Because of phosphorus interactions my relaxation times on the carbon are rather large. That gives small signals, too.

Good Luck.

Comment by jake p (2010-06-07 09:17:58)


presaturation, you suppresss the peak

 
 
Comment by around the corner and down the hall (2008-05-16 06:12:06)


My guess at the reason why you are getting crap after removing DMSO is that you are heating it. I have recently come across two (non-heating) ways to remove DMSO that you could try. If you have access to a lyophilizer, freeze your sample and place it in there. I have had quite a bit of success doing this (no bumping even!). The other thing to try is to gently blow argon/nitrogen/air over the sample, oddly enough this seems to do the trick…

Comment by Phil (2008-05-16 06:50:14)


If I try this with our lyophilizer, the other users will kill me! Doesn’t the DMSO thaw?

I could try anyway… would be very useful.

 
 
Comment by around the corner and down the hall (2008-05-16 14:47:01)


How much DMSO are you talking about? I doubt that a little bit of DMSO trapped on the cooling coil would do much harm (as long as you clean it out when you are finished), but some people just get freaked out over the most ridiculous of things. You are right though, it probably will thaw but this method still seems to work and we never observed any bumping. We actually found that adding a small bit of water (if your compound can handle it) kept the entire thing frozen, well at least every time we checked it was frozen.

 
Comment by Enahs (2008-05-16 16:51:40)


There are other solvents you can use besides DMSO in NMR; perhaps your compound will be more soluble in one of those?

Also, 5mg in how much volume? 5mg is a freakin huge amount.

Comment by Phil (2008-05-17 02:11:58)


The real problem is that I’m working with nitrogen-containing heteroaromatics (guanine analogs) that are bastards to handle. Besides containing lots of tautomers, they are rock-solid. The only other kind of solvent that works for me is acidic D2O, but this specific example is much less soluble in that. Methanol? Forget it.

I’m talking about a “normal” NMR volume of about 0.6 mL. Our institute will get a cryoprobe in the near future, which will hopefully solve my sensitivity problems.

 
 
Comment by sm30 (2008-05-17 14:25:03)


peak irradiation to suppress the solvent signal isn’t a bad idea. I’ve noticed there are many NMR tricks you can turn to before you absolutely need to run a new sample. You need a good NMR guy to show you whats up though if you don’t already know. If you’ve already tried all the deuterated solvents I’ve heard of people using carbon tet for the NMR (mainly for proton though). Are you positive you’re working with the free base? Lyophailizing takes a while and i’m assuming you dont want to deal with that lag. I’m a little surprised no D-solvent has worked. I’ve seen a LOT of solubility issues with these types of heteroaromatics though.

 
Comment by anon (2008-05-24 09:20:49)


lb=2 wft

check and see if you see peaks that SEEM reasonable (even w/o reasonable S/N), then check your decoupler frequency. maybe you can move the irradiation point so you get better 1H decoupling (a more serious problem w/ 13C peaks at about 200+, though)

adding a relaxation agent can help IMMENSELY eg. Cr(III)acac or whatever floats your boat (and doesn’t kill your stuff).

if the above fails stop making brick dust. :)

Comment by Phil (2008-05-25 23:34:39)


Thanks, I’ll try that!

 
 
Comment by NP (2008-11-18 01:36:36)


Shigemi tubes, either 5mm or 3mm, will allow you to easily reduce your required sample volume down to 1/3 the “normal” amount. They are available matched to deuterated DMSO, D2O, CDCl3 and MeOH. Cost is around $100 per tube, but at standard NMR hourly rates they pay for themselves quickly.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post




Google Ads





Recent Chemistry

Electrocatalytic Activity of Graphene Multilayers toward I−/I3−: Effect of Preparation Conditions and Polyelectrolyte Modification
(The Journal of Physical Chemistry C)
ChemFeeds Nav: [Leave a Comment][See Related]

Good Chemistry Books


Classics in Total Synthesis II: More Targets, Strategies, Methods

The Chemistry of Polymers


Social Chemistry

- Probably the best chemistry channel on YouTube. [1 hour ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- An Urgent Question [8 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Materials Chemistry
- I can't wrap my head around s and p orbitals! [11 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Free radical reaction of carbon or silicon to aluminum [12 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- Primo Levi - Periodic Table of Videos [17 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Allylic alcohol, configuration inversion. [17 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Organic (Undergraduate)
- Could a good chemist weigh in on a question I'd like to be more informed about; Is sous-vide cooking safe? [18 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- What is the most dangerous substance according the NFPA 704 System? [19 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Solubility Software - Salting Out [20 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- File Format Conversion from GCMS raw data to .CDF format [22 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- transport number [1 day ago]
Chemical Forums - Physical (Graduate)
- Dear Chemit, I have a college Chemistry 102 proficiency exam tomorrow. What should I know? [1 day ago]
Chemistry Reddit