<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon NMR Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/</link>
	<description>We have technical difficulties, it will take a day or two to get back to normal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:57:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NP</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>NP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>Shigemi tubes, either 5mm or 3mm, will allow you to easily reduce your required sample volume down to 1/3 the &quot;normal&quot; amount. They are available matched to deuterated DMSO, D2O, CDCl3 and MeOH. Cost is around $100 per tube, but at standard NMR hourly rates they pay for themselves quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shigemi tubes, either 5mm or 3mm, will allow you to easily reduce your required sample volume down to 1/3 the &#8220;normal&#8221; amount. They are available matched to deuterated DMSO, D2O, CDCl3 and MeOH. Cost is around $100 per tube, but at standard NMR hourly rates they pay for themselves quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 06:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;ll try that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ll try that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>lb=2 wft

check and see if you see peaks that SEEM reasonable (even w/o reasonable S/N), then check your decoupler frequency.  maybe you can move the irradiation point so you get better 1H decoupling (a more serious problem w/ 13C peaks at about 200+, though)

adding a relaxation agent can help IMMENSELY eg. Cr(III)acac or whatever floats your boat (and doesn&#039;t kill your stuff).

if the above fails stop making brick dust.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lb=2 wft</p>
<p>check and see if you see peaks that SEEM reasonable (even w/o reasonable S/N), then check your decoupler frequency.  maybe you can move the irradiation point so you get better 1H decoupling (a more serious problem w/ 13C peaks at about 200+, though)</p>
<p>adding a relaxation agent can help IMMENSELY eg. Cr(III)acac or whatever floats your boat (and doesn&#8217;t kill your stuff).</p>
<p>if the above fails stop making brick dust.  <img src='http://www.chemistry-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sm30</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>sm30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-873</guid>
		<description>peak irradiation to suppress the solvent signal isn&#039;t a bad idea. I&#039;ve noticed there are many NMR tricks you can turn to before you absolutely need to run a new sample. You need a good NMR guy to show you whats up though if you don&#039;t already know. If you&#039;ve already tried all the deuterated solvents I&#039;ve heard of people using carbon tet for the NMR (mainly for proton though). Are you positive you&#039;re working with the free base? Lyophailizing takes a while and i&#039;m assuming you dont want to deal with that lag. I&#039;m a little surprised no D-solvent has worked. I&#039;ve seen a LOT of solubility issues with these types of heteroaromatics though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peak irradiation to suppress the solvent signal isn&#8217;t a bad idea. I&#8217;ve noticed there are many NMR tricks you can turn to before you absolutely need to run a new sample. You need a good NMR guy to show you whats up though if you don&#8217;t already know. If you&#8217;ve already tried all the deuterated solvents I&#8217;ve heard of people using carbon tet for the NMR (mainly for proton though). Are you positive you&#8217;re working with the free base? Lyophailizing takes a while and i&#8217;m assuming you dont want to deal with that lag. I&#8217;m a little surprised no D-solvent has worked. I&#8217;ve seen a LOT of solubility issues with these types of heteroaromatics though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-870</guid>
		<description>The real problem is that I&#039;m working with nitrogen-containing heteroaromatics (guanine analogs) that are bastards to handle. Besides containing lots of tautomers, they are rock-solid. The only other kind of solvent that works for me is acidic D2O, but this specific example is much less soluble in that. Methanol? Forget it.

I&#039;m talking about a &quot;normal&quot; NMR volume of about 0.6 mL. Our institute will get a cryoprobe in the near future, which will hopefully solve my sensitivity problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem is that I&#8217;m working with nitrogen-containing heteroaromatics (guanine analogs) that are bastards to handle. Besides containing lots of tautomers, they are rock-solid. The only other kind of solvent that works for me is acidic D2O, but this specific example is much less soluble in that. Methanol? Forget it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about a &#8220;normal&#8221; NMR volume of about 0.6 mL. Our institute will get a cryoprobe in the near future, which will hopefully solve my sensitivity problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enahs</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Enahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-865</guid>
		<description>There are other solvents you can use besides DMSO in NMR; perhaps your compound will be more soluble in one of those?

Also, 5mg in how much volume? 5mg is a freakin huge amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other solvents you can use besides DMSO in NMR; perhaps your compound will be more soluble in one of those?</p>
<p>Also, 5mg in how much volume? 5mg is a freakin huge amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: around the corner and down the hall</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>around the corner and down the hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-864</guid>
		<description>How much DMSO are you talking about?  I doubt that a little bit of DMSO  trapped on the cooling coil would do much harm (as long as you clean it out when you are finished), but some people just get freaked out over the most ridiculous of things. You are right though, it probably will thaw but this method still seems to work and we never observed any bumping.  We actually found that adding a small bit of water (if your compound can handle it) kept the entire thing frozen, well at least every time we checked it was frozen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much DMSO are you talking about?  I doubt that a little bit of DMSO  trapped on the cooling coil would do much harm (as long as you clean it out when you are finished), but some people just get freaked out over the most ridiculous of things. You are right though, it probably will thaw but this method still seems to work and we never observed any bumping.  We actually found that adding a small bit of water (if your compound can handle it) kept the entire thing frozen, well at least every time we checked it was frozen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-863</guid>
		<description>If I try this with our lyophilizer, the other users will kill me! Doesn&#039;t the DMSO thaw?

I could try anyway... would be very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I try this with our lyophilizer, the other users will kill me! Doesn&#8217;t the DMSO thaw?</p>
<p>I could try anyway&#8230; would be very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: around the corner and down the hall</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>around the corner and down the hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-861</guid>
		<description>My guess at the reason why you are getting crap after removing DMSO is that you are heating it.  I have recently come across two (non-heating) ways to remove DMSO that you could try.  If you have access to a lyophilizer, freeze your sample and place it in there.  I have had quite a bit of success doing this (no bumping even!).  The other thing to try is to gently blow argon/nitrogen/air over the sample, oddly enough this seems to do the trick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess at the reason why you are getting crap after removing DMSO is that you are heating it.  I have recently come across two (non-heating) ways to remove DMSO that you could try.  If you have access to a lyophilizer, freeze your sample and place it in there.  I have had quite a bit of success doing this (no bumping even!).  The other thing to try is to gently blow argon/nitrogen/air over the sample, oddly enough this seems to do the trick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Schramm</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/05/16/carbon-nmr-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Schramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=248#comment-860</guid>
		<description>There are methods to supress Solvent signals. Not that I would know what they are, but my boss does. I have the same problem with one of my compunds. Because of phosphorus interactions my relaxation times on the carbon are rather large. That gives small signals, too.

Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are methods to supress Solvent signals. Not that I would know what they are, but my boss does. I have the same problem with one of my compunds. Because of phosphorus interactions my relaxation times on the carbon are rather large. That gives small signals, too.</p>
<p>Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
