<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Origin of Life Chemistry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/</link>
	<description>We have technical difficulties, it will take a day or two to get back to normal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:53:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chemistry Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Anomeric Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-4475</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemistry Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Anomeric Effect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-4475</guid>
		<description>[...] a post several months ago, I was talking about sugars and mentioned: Note that in the cyclic isomer of glucose – [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post several months ago, I was talking about sugars and mentioned: Note that in the cyclic isomer of glucose – [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Hutchins</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-4268</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Hutchins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-4268</guid>
		<description>Hahah. That made me laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahah. That made me laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>From Becky&#039;s link:

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you tire of the insanity in our world, want to be a better and healthier person, feel despair, suspect that there is more to this drama called life than the mere interaction of atoms, are confused by notions of creation, evolution, religion, atheism, and immortality, and would like rational answers that accord with reality and satisfy your intellect and intuition—WELCOME!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sound like quackery. What&#039;s more important than the interaction of atoms at a Chemistry Blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Becky&#8217;s link:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you tire of the insanity in our world, want to be a better and healthier person, feel despair, suspect that there is more to this drama called life than the mere interaction of atoms, are confused by notions of creation, evolution, religion, atheism, and immortality, and would like rational answers that accord with reality and satisfy your intellect and intuition—WELCOME!</p></blockquote>
<p>Sound like quackery. What&#8217;s more important than the interaction of atoms at a Chemistry Blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>Very Interesting. Randy Wysong&#039;s newest book, &quot;Living Life,&quot; has also answered a lot of my questions concerning the philosophy of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asifthinkingmatters.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;origin of life.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Interesting. Randy Wysong&#8217;s newest book, &#8220;Living Life,&#8221; has also answered a lot of my questions concerning the philosophy of the <a href="http://www.asifthinkingmatters.com/" rel="nofollow">origin of life.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>In regards to the anomeric effect, no one else finds it strange that when there is no good stereoelectronic effect explanation all of a sudden hyperconjugation is the key?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the anomeric effect, no one else finds it strange that when there is no good stereoelectronic effect explanation all of a sudden hyperconjugation is the key?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2597</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2597</guid>
		<description>Maybe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this girl&lt;/a&gt; can write a rap about it and explain it to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM" rel="nofollow">this girl</a> can write a rap about it and explain it to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>Another theory is that it is due to the Weak Interaction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction), which violates parity symmetry. I.e. it only acts on left-handed particles. Please ask no further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another theory is that it is due to the Weak Interaction (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction</a>), which violates parity symmetry. I.e. it only acts on left-handed particles. Please ask no further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>The origin of chirality is another one of my favorite concepts to ponder.  It was actually kind of cute: the other day I was sitting in an undergrad first-semester organic class, and the professor brought up that all amino acids (except glycine) are L-amino acids and mentioned that that was one of the big mysteries still out there in chemistry.  One of the students piped up, &quot;is it really that unclear?  Couldn&#039;t proteins have just made one enantiomer over the other?&quot;

The first-one-to-self-replicate theory is a good one.  It assumes a singular point origin of chirality.  If there were two &#039;first molecules&#039; that began replicating at opposite ends of the Earth, they&#039;d have to have been the same chirality to begin with.  I&#039;ve heard several other theories as to the origin of chirality.  The spiral nature of our galaxy perhaps imparted some preference for one over the other...  Circular polarized light affected the early reactions to be enantioselective...

The authors of the above paper don&#039;t really go into it, but if their carbohydrate world theory holds true, maybe the early sugars were the template upon which homochiral amino acids/nucleic acids were formed, as I talked about above?  If glucose was synthesized preferentially through thermodynamic preference for the equatorial position of the hydroxyl groups, maybe that enantioselectivity was the basis for the enantioselectivity of future amino acids or nucleic acids?

Some references I found just now by Googling...
http://www-geology.ucdavis.edu/~cowen/HistoryofLife/chirality.html
http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~meech/bioast/program/OTHER.7.41.pdf
http://courses.washington.edu/bangblue/L4a5FA08_2.pdf
http://www.zoology.ufl.edu/Evolution/Lecture%20Notes/Lecture%2017%20-%20Origin%20of%20Life%20on%20Earth.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The origin of chirality is another one of my favorite concepts to ponder.  It was actually kind of cute: the other day I was sitting in an undergrad first-semester organic class, and the professor brought up that all amino acids (except glycine) are L-amino acids and mentioned that that was one of the big mysteries still out there in chemistry.  One of the students piped up, &#8220;is it really that unclear?  Couldn&#8217;t proteins have just made one enantiomer over the other?&#8221;</p>
<p>The first-one-to-self-replicate theory is a good one.  It assumes a singular point origin of chirality.  If there were two &#8216;first molecules&#8217; that began replicating at opposite ends of the Earth, they&#8217;d have to have been the same chirality to begin with.  I&#8217;ve heard several other theories as to the origin of chirality.  The spiral nature of our galaxy perhaps imparted some preference for one over the other&#8230;  Circular polarized light affected the early reactions to be enantioselective&#8230;</p>
<p>The authors of the above paper don&#8217;t really go into it, but if their carbohydrate world theory holds true, maybe the early sugars were the template upon which homochiral amino acids/nucleic acids were formed, as I talked about above?  If glucose was synthesized preferentially through thermodynamic preference for the equatorial position of the hydroxyl groups, maybe that enantioselectivity was the basis for the enantioselectivity of future amino acids or nucleic acids?</p>
<p>Some references I found just now by Googling&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www-geology.ucdavis.edu/~cowen/HistoryofLife/chirality.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-geology.ucdavis.edu/~cowen/HistoryofLife/chirality.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~meech/bioast/program/OTHER.7.41.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~meech/bioast/program/OTHER.7.41.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://courses.washington.edu/bangblue/L4a5FA08_2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://courses.washington.edu/bangblue/L4a5FA08_2.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.zoology.ufl.edu/Evolution/Lecture%20Notes/Lecture%2017%20-%20Origin%20of%20Life%20on%20Earth.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoology.ufl.edu/Evolution/Lecture%20Notes/Lecture%2017%20-%20Origin%20of%20Life%20on%20Earth.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2585</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2585</guid>
		<description>Another interesting issue that is related to the origin of life is the origin of chirality. How come that (almost) all amino acids found on earth are the L-isomer? The same holds for nucleic acids. You would think that structures that had formed accidentally would be racemic as neither enantiomer is energetically more favourable...

Imagine a scenario like this: By pure chance, some homochiral nucleic acids form a structure that starts to self-replicate. All the replica structures would then be of the same chirality as the original one. If this initial self-replicating structure is formed only once, all nucleic acids generated in this way would be homochiral, and the symmetry would be broken!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting issue that is related to the origin of life is the origin of chirality. How come that (almost) all amino acids found on earth are the L-isomer? The same holds for nucleic acids. You would think that structures that had formed accidentally would be racemic as neither enantiomer is energetically more favourable&#8230;</p>
<p>Imagine a scenario like this: By pure chance, some homochiral nucleic acids form a structure that starts to self-replicate. All the replica structures would then be of the same chirality as the original one. If this initial self-replicating structure is formed only once, all nucleic acids generated in this way would be homochiral, and the symmetry would be broken!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/11/18/origin-of-life-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=342#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I&#039;m going to have to preclude my prelude teaser. Comment above edited. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I&#8217;m going to have to preclude my prelude teaser. Comment above edited. <img src='http://www.chemistry-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
