Subscribe to RSS





Recent Comments


Chemistry News

- ACS Again Appeals Leadscope Case
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- This Month in Chemical History
C&ENtral Science
- Clean Your Plate, Save Energy
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Charles River Drops Bid To Buy WuXi
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Chemical Security
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Chemical Earnings Bounce Back
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Cap And Trade Dies In Senate
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- Fossilised life on Mars
Chemistry World blog
- Chemistry World's round-up of money and molecules
Chemistry World blog
- Daily Pump Trap: 7/30/10 edition
Chemjobber
- Reactions - Myunghyun Paik Suh
The Sceptical Chymist
- Risky teams, forged banknotes, frost-proof frogs
Sciencebase Science Blog
- Craig Venter, Venting
In the Pipeline
- I quit
Carbon-Based Curiosities
- 07/28/10 PHD comic: 'Extraneous'
Piled Higher and Deeper RSS Gradfeed

Porn at the NSF?

by boyie on Jan 28 2009 (2432 Views)

For those of you who dont know, Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the Finance Committee on the Senate is doing an investigation into the National Science Foundation. Why? Well, because people have been spending time looking at porn instead of doing what they’re suppose to do (look through our grant proposals perhaps?)

===================================================================================

Chuck Grassley knows it when he sees it.

The “it,” of course, is pornography. And Grassley has seen it deep in a demurely titled section of a report from the National Science Foundation — a report that says NSF employees have been spending significant amounts of company time on smut sites and in other explicit pursuits….

In one particularly egregious case, the report says one NSF “senior official” was discovered to have spent as much as 20 percent of his working hours over a two-year interval “viewing sexually explicit images and engaging in sexually explicit online ‘chats’ with various women.”

Investigators calculated the value of the time lost at more than $58,000 — for that employee alone.

===================================================================================

I dont think this spells good news for people trying to get grants right now. Amongst my friends and I, we can already imagine the responses to grants.

Prof. So and So,

We are unable to fund your proposal because….it costs money to investigate people looking into porn at work.

Sincerely,

The NSF and the Senate

For more, here’s the link: Grassley launches porn inquiry into the NSF


Posted on : Jan 28 2009
Posted under science news |

RSS feed | Trackback URI

8 Comments »

Comment by mitch (2009-01-28 10:47:12)


When we assume those leadership positions there will be senators saying, “50% of this senior NSF official’s time was spent on blogs! Think of the children.”

 
Comment by boyie (2009-01-28 10:55:44)


What is really sad is the comments that have been posted about the article. This really doesnt help the image of science being important and we should spend money on it. Oye.

 
Comment by azmanam (2009-01-28 11:46:14)


Hmm… Government workers misusing government resources?

Color me shocked.

 
Comment by Chemjobber (2009-01-28 12:23:42)


The best part is the dude setting up a webcam at work for video sex and then complaining to the IT department that it’s slow. That guy has guts.

I don’t think “pr0n watching” is what Obama meant by a stimulus. (Thanks, I’ll be here all week! Don’t forget to tip your blogger!)

Comment by j (2009-01-28 15:45:10)


Take my wife.. please (*rimshot*)

Comment by mitch (2009-01-29 03:00:42)
Comment by Chemjobber (2009-01-29 11:53:59)


National Science Foundation at Work? ;-)

 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post




Google Ads





Recent Chemistry

Temperature Dependent Raman Spectra of Carbon Nanobuds
(The Journal of Physical Chemistry C)
ChemFeeds Nav: [Leave a Comment][See Related]

Good Chemistry Books


Contemporary Aspects of Boron

Transition Metals in the Synthesis of Complex Organic Molecules


Social Chemistry

- Recrystallization - Trial and Error? [8 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Inorganic (Undergraduate)
- Hey /r/chemistry help me find a book to read! [10 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Can Carboxymethyl Cellulose Ether be used as anesthesia? [11 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Chemical Biology
- What chemical will dissolve plastic but not brass? [19 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- Volume shrinkage of epoxy [19 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Physical (Undergraduate)
- spiking experiment/study [20 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- MOVED: Fill in this microscopy related survey and you'll receive a free gift. [21 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Analytical (Undergraduate)
- Inorganic chemistry reactions [22 hours ago]
Chemical Forums - Inorganic (Undergraduate)
- Help needed: American chemist looking for advice on graduate school abroad [22 hours ago]
Chemistry Reddit
- ion displacement theory [1 day ago]
Chemical Forums - Inorganic (Undergraduate)
- Retinoids from cod liver oil [2 days ago]
Chemical Forums - Organic (Undergraduate)
- Isocyanate Chemistry [2 days ago]
Chemistry Reddit