Subscribe to RSS





Recent Comments

- Cheap Laugh Tuesdays #17: Molecular Modeling
Brendan, sanst576, Chemjobber, Chemjobber,
- Science for the future
Mark, Mitch,
- Sigma Aldrich Vending Machines
Patrick, kstevens, Fleaker, medchem,

Chemistry News

- Ionic Liquids as Two-in-One Nanoreactors
ChemViews Magazine Home RSS
- New Route to Aminohydantoins
ChemViews Magazine Home RSS
- Basic Kinetics: SN1 (or E1 for than matter)
ChemScrapes
- Spring Into Science Fair
Just Like Cooking
- Crack
ChemScrapes
- Azulene
ChemScrapes
- Ungunkable
Babbage
- Maintaining Merit Review
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- chemicals ad campaign
Everyday Scientist
- FCT volta a adiar abertura de concurso para bolsas de doutoramento
blog about science
- Some of our dark matter is missing
Sciencebase Science Blog
- Thoughts while sitting in a meeting
Chemjobber
- CLT #35: Sudoku
Chemistry Blog
- Chemistry World’s roundup of money and molecules
Chemistry World blog
- Chemistry in its element – muscone
Chemistry World blog

Porn at the NSF?

by boyie on Jan 28 2009 (4698 Views)

For those of you who dont know, Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the Finance Committee on the Senate is doing an investigation into the National Science Foundation. Why? Well, because people have been spending time looking at porn instead of doing what they're suppose to do (look through our grant proposals perhaps?)

===================================================================================

Chuck Grassley knows it when he sees it.

The “it,” of course, is pornography. And Grassley has seen it deep in a demurely titled section of a report from the National Science Foundation — a report that says NSF employees have been spending significant amounts of company time on smut sites and in other explicit pursuits....

In one particularly egregious case, the report says one NSF “senior official” was discovered to have spent as much as 20 percent of his working hours over a two-year interval “viewing sexually explicit images and engaging in sexually explicit online ‘chats’ with various women.”

Investigators calculated the value of the time lost at more than $58,000 — for that employee alone.

===================================================================================

I dont think this spells good news for people trying to get grants right now. Amongst my friends and I, we can already imagine the responses to grants.

Prof. So and So,

We are unable to fund your proposal because....it costs money to investigate people looking into porn at work.

Sincerely,

The NSF and the Senate

For more, here's the link: Grassley launches porn inquiry into the NSF


Posted on : Jan 28 2009
Posted under science news |

8 Responses to “Porn at the NSF?”

  1. 1
    mitch says:

    When we assume those leadership positions there will be senators saying, "50% of this senior NSF official's time was spent on blogs! Think of the children."

  2. 2
    boyie says:

    What is really sad is the comments that have been posted about the article. This really doesnt help the image of science being important and we should spend money on it. Oye.

  3. 3
    azmanam says:

    Hmm... Government workers misusing government resources?

    Color me shocked.

  4. 4
    Chemjobber says:

    The best part is the dude setting up a webcam at work for video sex and then complaining to the IT department that it's slow. That guy has guts.

    I don't think "pr0n watching" is what Obama meant by a stimulus. (Thanks, I'll be here all week! Don't forget to tip your blogger!)

  5. 5

    [...] has some issues with NSFW web surfing. Politico (hat tip to Chemistry Blog for the story and the acronym [...]

Leave a Reply



Google Ads




Announcements




Reagent Table Widget


Desktop version



Social Chemistry

Titration question [1 hour ago]
Which topics from General Chemistry are most important for understanding Organic Chemistry? [2 hours ago]
I really hope this autograph is real... If not... going to keep pretending. [3 hours ago]
Vilsmeier-Haack reaction [3 hours ago]
Can I get a basic explanation of Colligative Properties? [4 hours ago]
Acid/Base + Buffer [5 hours ago]
I have a question about a naming of a coumpound. gamma-glutamylcysteine what does gamma imply? [6 hours ago]
TIL that the four boxes sometimes seen on old gas cylinders are supply companies trying to cover swastikas stamped by the Nazi's [8 hours ago]
Can anyone suggest online teaching aids for organic chemistry? [8 hours ago]
Isolation of a carboxylic acid [8 hours ago]
I am starting my 3rd year as a chemistry major. Exploring my options. With salary in mind, assuming I have equal interest in biology, environmental science and pharmacology, which one should I lean towards? [10 hours ago]
I found the source for many of the chemistry comics that get posted here [13 hours ago]
2 reactions [13 hours ago]
"Researchers develop graphene supercapacitor holding promise for portable electronics", says the UCLA Newsroom; is anyone closer to the action in a position to judge how real this is? Where can one read sober analysis of the breakdown voltage, e [15 hours ago]
Iodide solution [16 hours ago]
Does anyone know where to get some decent labware [17 hours ago]
Hey r/chemistry, did you checkout the new chemistry stackexchange site yet? [18 hours ago]
The "invisible electrolysis" phenomena. Explanation? [18 hours ago]