<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Symbol for Copernicium: Cn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/09/29/new-symbol-for-element-112-cn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/09/29/new-symbol-for-element-112-cn/</link>
	<description>We have technical difficulties, it will take a day or two to get back to normal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:37:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chemistry World blog &#187; Copernicium - Cp ditched in favour of Cn</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/09/29/new-symbol-for-element-112-cn/comment-page-1/#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemistry World blog &#187; Copernicium - Cp ditched in favour of Cn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=2694#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>[...] it seems I&#8217;ve taken my eye off the ball on this one - the more clued-in members of the blogosphere noticed quite some time ago that the proposed symbol for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it seems I&#8217;ve taken my eye off the ball on this one &#8211; the more clued-in members of the blogosphere noticed quite some time ago that the proposed symbol for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De papa van Copernicium &#171; Scheikundejongens</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/09/29/new-symbol-for-element-112-cn/comment-page-1/#comment-7094</link>
		<dc:creator>De papa van Copernicium &#171; Scheikundejongens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=2694#comment-7094</guid>
		<description>[...] dat ooit voorgestelde namen, niet voor andere elementen mogen worden gebruikt, dus er komt een nieuwe afkorting voor copernicium: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dat ooit voorgestelde namen, niet voor andere elementen mogen worden gebruikt, dus er komt een nieuwe afkorting voor copernicium: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/09/29/new-symbol-for-element-112-cn/comment-page-1/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=2694#comment-7093</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll sleep easier tonight...

I&#039;d also like to fussily point out that my fuss was slightly tongue-in-cheek fuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll sleep easier tonight&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to fussily point out that my fuss was slightly tongue-in-cheek fuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
