Subscribe to RSS





Recent Comments

- Cheap Laugh Tuesdays #17: Molecular Modeling
Brendan, sanst576, Chemjobber, Chemjobber,
- Science for the future
Mark, Mitch,
- Sigma Aldrich Vending Machines
Patrick, kstevens, Fleaker, medchem,

Chemistry News

- Ionic Liquids as Two-in-One Nanoreactors
ChemViews Magazine Home RSS
- New Route to Aminohydantoins
ChemViews Magazine Home RSS
- Basic Kinetics: SN1 (or E1 for than matter)
ChemScrapes
- Spring Into Science Fair
Just Like Cooking
- Crack
ChemScrapes
- Azulene
ChemScrapes
- Ungunkable
Babbage
- Maintaining Merit Review
Chemical & Engineering News: Latest News
- chemicals ad campaign
Everyday Scientist
- FCT volta a adiar abertura de concurso para bolsas de doutoramento
blog about science
- Some of our dark matter is missing
Sciencebase Science Blog
- Thoughts while sitting in a meeting
Chemjobber
- CLT #35: Sudoku
Chemistry Blog
- Chemistry World’s roundup of money and molecules
Chemistry World blog
- Chemistry in its element – muscone
Chemistry World blog

Good News: Lancet Article Author Cooks Data on Vaccine/Autism Link Updated and Bumped: Lancet Retracts Wakefield's 1998 Paper

by azmanam on Feb 02 2010 (8457 Views)

(See important update, below)

The Times of London yesterday ran a story that Jenny McCarthy needs to read (h/t HotAir.com).  The article details an investigation of the results of the 1998 paper in the Lancet medical journal which shows a link between thimerosal in MMR vaccines and autism.  The investigation concludes the author, Andrew Wakefield, manipulated data to show the link.

Confidential medical documents and interviews with witnesses have established that Andrew Wakefield manipulated patients’ data, which triggered fears that the MMR triple vaccine to protect against measles, mumps and rubella was linked to the condition.

The research ... claimed that the families of eight out of 12 children attending a routine clinic at the hospital had blamed MMR for their autism, and said that problems came on within days of the jab. The team also claimed to have discovered a new inflammatory bowel disease underlying the children’s conditions.

However, our investigation ... reveals that: In most of the 12 cases, the children’s ailments as described in The Lancet were different from their hospital and GP records. Although the research paper claimed that problems came on within days of the jab, in only one case did medical records suggest this was true, and in many of the cases medical concerns had been raised before the children were vaccinated. Hospital pathologists, looking for inflammatory bowel disease, reported in the majority of cases that the gut was normal. This was then reviewed and the Lancet paper showed them as abnormal.

How convincing was Dr. Wakefield's article?  Vaccination rates in the UK dropped from 98% to below 80%.  Some 1350 cases of measles have been confirmed in the UK, a 2400% increase over the number of confirmed cases in 1998.

Besides the obvious implications of manipulated data, no one seemed too concerned that Dr. Wakefield's sample in the 1998 paper included only 12 children.  Time after time after time, studies have tried to replicate Dr. Wakefield's results.  Not surprisingly (anymore), no one was able to.  Yet, that doesn't stop parents from receiving news time warning about vaccines, the CDC from needing to issue a statement on the safety of thimerosal, the HHS from issuing money from the vaccine injury fund (!), and major presidential candidates from telling town hall attendees that there is a "strong link" between thimerosal and autism.

I don't even think this qualifies for an Ig Nobel award.  It's just infuriating.

Update (2/2/10): Today, the Lancet Medical Journal officially retracted Dr. Wakefield's original 1998 paper.  The retraction was the final domino to fall in officially discrediting the specious claim linking thimerosal and autism.  How long will it take to rid the vaccine-autism link from the minds of worried parents?  That's a different question.  Hopefully, though, doctors can now use this to help persuade overly-worried parents that vaccines are indeed safe.


10 Responses to “Good News: Lancet Article Author Cooks Data on Vaccine/Autism Link Updated and Bumped: Lancet Retracts Wakefield's 1998 Paper

  1. 1
    boyie says:

    You forgot to mention that he had conflicts of interest with that paper. He had a patent on another type of vaccine for MMR that would've done much better if the current MMR vaccine was somehow debunked. Oh,and also, there's an ENDEMIC of measles, mumps and ruebella in the UK now..

  2. 2
    mitch says:

    Water will "remember" the vaccine and infect more people like a plague. Think of the children!

  3. 3
    Chemjobber says:

    You're right -- an Ig Nobel is for frivolous, but harmless science. This paper has done real harm, I think, and from a statistical perspective, has probably killed someone by now. Thanks, doc!

  4. 4
    The Chemist says:

    Yeah this was all over badastronomy and other science websites. Sadly, if some of the comments on these sites are indicative of anything- antivaxxers will find this uncompelling at best.

  5. 5
    Bob says:

    Will this scientist be keeping their job?

  6. 6
    Monado says:

    He was already taking money for an anti-vax lawsuit. Some of the children were referred to the clinic because they were already having intestinal problems. Some of them were having developmental problems before vaccination. Some didn't develop problems until months afterwards: Wakefield altered the dates to within a couple of weeks. And the MMR is a live, but weak, virus vaccine that does not contain thimerosal: that would kill the viruses, which are supposed to perk along in your body, providing you with stronger, more continuous immunity against a broader range virus descendants.

  7. 7
    mitch says:

    It will never go away. It has done permanent and irreparable harm.

  8. 8
    chiraljones says:

    It's news like this that makes me so incredibly happy to be a scientist - when good science ultimately prevails. However, the reality that antivaxers STILL might not be swayed makes me want to give up on humanity and go live with penguins in Antarctica or something.

    I don't suppose there's any happy medium between the two...

  9. 9
    Maz says:

    It might have gone away if it was just a silly old wives tale style of circulating rumor.

    Instead a bunch of idiots in hollywood threw their weight behind it, and we all know that they know more about this subject and are more honest than us stupid lying scientists. Well, maybe Oprah will do a special and help fix the public mindset. I mean, everybody believes Oprah.

Leave a Reply



Google Ads




Announcements




Reagent Table Widget


Desktop version



Social Chemistry

Why is concentration of gas independent of the amount of solid producing it [3 hours ago]
Titration question [4 hours ago]
Which topics from General Chemistry are most important for understanding Organic Chemistry? [4 hours ago]
I really hope this autograph is real... If not... going to keep pretending. [5 hours ago]
Can I get a basic explanation of Colligative Properties? [6 hours ago]
Acid/Base + Buffer [7 hours ago]
I have a question about a naming of a coumpound. gamma-glutamylcysteine what does gamma imply? [8 hours ago]
TIL that the four boxes sometimes seen on old gas cylinders are supply companies trying to cover swastikas stamped by the Nazi's [10 hours ago]
Can anyone suggest online teaching aids for organic chemistry? [11 hours ago]
Isolation of a carboxylic acid [11 hours ago]
I am starting my 3rd year as a chemistry major. Exploring my options. With salary in mind, assuming I have equal interest in biology, environmental science and pharmacology, which one should I lean towards? [12 hours ago]
I found the source for many of the chemistry comics that get posted here [15 hours ago]
2 reactions [16 hours ago]
"Researchers develop graphene supercapacitor holding promise for portable electronics", says the UCLA Newsroom; is anyone closer to the action in a position to judge how real this is? Where can one read sober analysis of the breakdown voltage, e [17 hours ago]
Iodide solution [18 hours ago]
Does anyone know where to get some decent labware [19 hours ago]
Hey r/chemistry, did you checkout the new chemistry stackexchange site yet? [21 hours ago]
The "invisible electrolysis" phenomena. Explanation? [21 hours ago]