It dawned on me that no one cared. The proteins that I found so fascinating just didn’t seem to intrigue them as much as they did me. I thought the video of water molecules flipping as they passed through the channel of aquaporin was marvellous. But it hardly gleaned a reaction from the sea of faces staring blankly out at me.
I left the lecture theatre and trudged back to my office. Wondering what was to be done with the course I’d tinkered with for years and never been happy with. Maybe it was time to just stop tinkering, throw it all away and start afresh?
The thought drifted away as I flicked through the, not insignificant, pile of emails that had dropped into my mail box during my brief absence from my desk. Top of the list was request to review a grant proposal.
And then inspiration struck, I could get my students to write grant proposals! That way they could explore the ideas and material that they are interested in without having my predilection for Major Intrinsic Proteins foisted on them.
So I set about a total revamping of the course.
- The lectures slides went in the bin.
Well actually they got turned into screencasts. But they might as well have gone in the bin, because the students don’t watch them.
- I gave the students examples of grant proposals that I’d written (ones that had got good reviews, even if they hadn’t been funded ).
- I supplied them with a load of references to papers that contained neat ideas.
- And I gave a lecture with avenues of research that I thought were intriguing.
- Then I provided them with a slightly altered version of a research council’s form and told them to complete it i.e they had to write a case for support, lay summary, justification for resources etc.
- They worked in groups of 6-7 and set about their tasks.
- The rest of the lectures I turned up to check on how things were going, guide the projects, tell them what I thought might work or not etc.
- And come the end of the course I marked the proposals based on genuine research council criteria AND each group peer reviewed 3 other proposals using the same criteria. Group members also gave an effort mark to each other (so free loaders didn’t get an easy ride). And the final mark was made up from an amalgamation of my mark, the peer review and the inter-group mark.
The results were great. Some really fabulous ideas sprung up. I’ve had students ask me if they can actually work on their research projects during their final year dissertations, and I bet some of proposals would have made the quality cut off in real funding rounds.
Right, enough from me, I’ve just come across a great idea for a project I need to get into the next funding round.