<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chemistry Blog &#187; scientific writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/tag/scientific-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com</link>
	<description>We have technical difficulties, it will take a day or two to get back to normal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can chemical compounds be pluralized?</title>
		<link>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/01/10/can-chemical-compounds-be-pluralized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/01/10/can-chemical-compounds-be-pluralized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brevetoxin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclopentenone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plurals of chemical compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemistry-blog.com/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to extract a paragraph from an earlier post and open it up for further discussion.  When I was creating the chemistry dictionary file, one of the last things I did was apply the dictionary file to ASAPs of popular ACS journals.  Here&#8217;s what I wrote: One of the biggest things I noticed during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to extract a paragraph from an <a href="http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2008/12/19/on-making-a-chemistry-dictionary-or-why-excel-and-macros-are-awesome/">earlier post</a> and open it up for further discussion.  When I was creating the chemistry dictionary file, one of the last things I did was apply the dictionary file to ASAPs of popular ACS journals.  Here&#8217;s what I wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the biggest things I noticed during this vetting was the use of plurals in scientific writing.  <a href="http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.12999.html">Cyclopentenone</a> is an actual compound and is in the dictionary.  If your research requires you to make a family of cyclopentenones, then the plural was probably not in the dictionary (it is now, though).  Although, that raises an interesting question: can you pluralize compounds like that?  Or is it more correct to say that a library of cyclopentenone <em>derivatives </em>was made?  Same thing with families of natural products.  Are they members of the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=brevetoxin">brevetoxins</a>?  Or are they more correctly members of the brevetoxin <em>family of natural products</em>?  I’m not sure I know the answer to that one.  One thing I do know is that I did not include plurals of elements.  Your <sup>13</sup>C NMR doesn’t tell you that you have 2 carbonyl carbons.  It tells you that you have 2 carbonyl carbon <em>atoms</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The ACS style guide (at least the 2nd edition) doesn&#8217;t comment explicitly on the use of plurals with chemical compounds.  What say you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chemistry-blog.com/2009/01/10/can-chemical-compounds-be-pluralized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
